SublimeREPL

[wuub]

Please vote:
http://sublimetext.userecho.com/topic/93643-/

[C0D312]

I can't wait to play with this

I'd be happy to help if you'd like (my diabolical plan to get my hands on it faster). I'm on OS X btw.

Any plans on charging for this?

[wuub]

I'd be happy to help if you'd like (my diabolical plan to get my hands on it faster). I'm on OS X btw.

No problem. I'm not overwhelmed with alpha testers... yet

Any plans on charging for this?

I probably could, but I won't. If you need it, use it. I even licensed it under BSD because I know that some organizations have a problem with GPL.

This doesn't mean that I don't appreciate words of encouragement, a patch/pull request, a link on the interwebs or an occasional donation.

Make no mistake, this project is an enormous time sink. I use it daily and in that way it's somewhat reasonable to improve things from time to time, but if it wasn't for the very few that decided to give something back (code, time or even hard-earned money) I would probably stopped publishing those changes a long time ago

[wuub]

SublimeREPL is now available via Package Control.

I advice anyone, who isn't doing any development, to re-install using the above method.

[GuriK]

Hello.
Is it possible to just run current file and see output ?
for example command like this : node server.js

[willy1234x1]

I love this but I want to know is there a way to set this up so that I can use iPython? This is on Windows, the settings file doesn't seem to have a way to point to a specific file so I'm not sure how to go about getting iPython working.

[wuub]

Is it possible to just run current file and see output ?
for example command like this : node server.js

It is, but I believe that Build Systems were created exactly for your use case and could be a better fit (Tools -> Build System)

is there a way to set this up so that I can use iPython

Theoretically yes, but for all practical purposes NO. At least not with current version and not on windows.
Making it work is on the TODO and with a pretty high priority (just after public alpha of terminal emulation on osx/linux). But for now you'll have to wait. Sorry :-/

[havri]

Hello!
Great plugin, great jog wuub! But I have problem with SublimeREPL when I am using Python 3. Every time I write something wrong and Python should respond with an error message, I get nothing and the error message will apear in the next call. There is an output for Python3:

Code: Select all

>>> import foo
>>> foo.fact(6)
720
>>> foo.fact('asd')
>>> 1+1
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
  File "/Users/user/Utilities/foo.py", line 41, in fact
    return 1 if n == 1 else n * fact(n - 1)
TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for -: 'str' and 'int'
2
>>> sys.version
'3.2 (r32:88452, Feb 20 2011, 10:19:59) \n[GCC 4.0.1 (Apple Inc. build 5493)]'
>>>

When I wrote foo.fact(‚asd‘) I did not get the error message. I had to write e.g. 1+1 to get the error message. Everything is alright with Python2:

Code: Select all

>>> import foo
>>> foo.fact(10)
3628800
>>> foo.fact('asd')
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
  File "/Users/user/Utilities/foo.py", line 41, in fact
    return 1 if n == 1 else n * fact(n - 1)
TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for -: 'str' and 'int'
>>> sys.version
'2.7.1 (r271:86832, Jun 16 2011, 16:59:05) \n[GCC 4.2.1 (Based on Apple Inc. build 5658) (LLVM build 2335.15.00)]'
>>>

I have changed the path to Python interpreter in SublimeREPL/config/Python/Main.sublime-menu. From "cmd": ["python", "-i”] to "cmd": ["/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.2/bin/python3", "-i”]. Nothing else.

Does anyone know where is the problem, please?

[C0D312]

How's progress on terminal emulation? I got really excited for it when I realized that this could mean interactive build systems

Imagine, just pressing a shortcut to open the terminal at the current directory and even set it to build the file. Endless possibilities...

[wuub]

Does anyone know where is the problem, please?

Add "-u" to options:

Code: Select all

"cmd": ["python", "-i", "-u"]

How's progress on terminal emulation?

As usual: slowly. I was AFK for the most of weekend.
I got through Conque's conque_sole (win32 terminal) code and now I understand what it does and more importantly why it does it this way.
It was important to do this exercise before going further with linux/osx version, because eventually we want to be cross platform and windows insanity unfortunately needs to be taken into account.