Anomareh wrote:Personally, I think the ideal solution would be making both versions available, ideally with the fork being split into a new package entirely (SublimeLint+ or something) or being made available as a dev release.
That is potentially a good idea for the next version. Right now it is not possible to map the names of individual repositories, just all repositories of a specific name. If I add the ability to map names on a per repository basis, then it would be possible to have both without any changes to the repositories.
Perhaps a better idea that would be clearer to users would be for the fork to rename itself. This would obviously require buy-in by the developer.
It is possible right now to add your own custom repositories to allow someone to use the original, but this doesn't help solve the discoverability problem for people. It would, however, allow for easy updating.