Sublime Forum

Nightly Build 2185

#1

Nightly Build 2185 is out now, with a small collection of improvements.

0 Likes

Where can I find the DL for a nightly build?
#2

There is something fishy going on with checked commands.

http://i.imgur.com/TQWxn.png http://i.imgur.com/5Wwd6.png

0 Likes

#3

Thanks for the report, I managed to make the default implement of is_checked() return True for plugins :confused:

0 Likes

#4

Hey, i think theres something wrong with the search function (Ubuntu 11.10, using Vintage). i cannot now exit using ESC, instead it goes into sort of the command mode but inside of the search area.
[edit] Just seen the search has fully stoped working for Vintage command mode.

0 Likes

#5

Love the new dialogs. It will make plugins look feel less hacky.

Just figured out the usage and tested out both with this:

sublime.message_dialog("Done.") if sublime.ok_cancel_dialog("Do it?") else sublime.message_dialog("Not done.")

And it worked great! Thanks for this addition. I like how I don’t have to point it to a function with the confirm dialog; it is nice being able to process it right at the moment it is invoked. It makes things much cleaner to code for.

0 Likes

#6

Looking forward to having some time to check out sublime.message_dialog and sublime.ok_cancel_dialog!

0 Likes

#7

The download link for Linux 32bit is broken. Also, .deb builds in a repository[1] would be very welcome!

[1] I know there’s an unofficial PPA, but nightlies aren’t there yet. :frowning:

0 Likes

#8

[quote]OSX: Added support for the ODB Editor Suite
API: Added sublime.message_dialog
API: Added sublime.ok_cancel_dialog[/quote]

Nice additions! Thanks

0 Likes

#9

Seems to be a focus issue in this build. Sometimes if I hit the delete key on OSX while typing in the console, it will instead delete text in my open view.

0 Likes

#10

The “Package Control: Remove Package” fail in the version (MAC OS 10.7)… crash…

0 Likes

#11

Since the last nightly build I’m getting some crashes when I change something in the preferences or perform any operation that changes something there, like disabling a package with package control or changing the font size with the keyboard, here’s my crash log:

gist.github.com/2008032

0 Likes

#12

I’m getting crashes with Nightly Build 2184 (previous) when installing or removing packages with Package Control. I can’t test changing the font size with the keyboard, via menu works good.

0 Likes

#13

It might be a minor issue, but:

When I’m using the Find function, if I click from the ‘Find’ text area to a word it found in the open file, the cursor won’t focus on the open file - it will stay in the ‘Find’ text area, so any changes I try to make to the file will instead just edit whatever’s in the ‘Find’ text area. (I’m using Win x64 version, in case it matters).

0 Likes

#14

I’m having the same issue with 2184 and 2185. I can’t get it to open without crashing.

EDIT: Nevermind. I was able to fix this by deleting Session.sublime-session

0 Likes

#15

[Bug] Incremental search no longer confirms/closes on enter. It’s unusable atm.

0 Likes

#16

The above issues should now be addressed in 2186.

In other news, I can now confirm that a test release of a broken nightly build hasn’t flooded the forum with complaints :wink:

0 Likes

#17

API documentation has been updated too.

It’s worth noting that sublime.ok_cancel_dialog takes an optional second parameter, which is the caption of the OK button. If provided the caption will be displayed on OS X and Linux, but not Windows.

0 Likes

#18

Oh… build 2186 unusable in Mac Os 10.7.3…

[code]Crashed Thread: 0 Dispatch queue: com.apple.main-thread

Exception Type: EXC_CRASH (SIGABRT)
Exception Codes: 0x0000000000000000, 0x0000000000000000

Application Specific Information:
objc[1095]: garbage collection is OFF
*** error for object 0x7f9062a36160: pointer being freed was not allocated
[/code]

0 Likes

#19

Looks like the previous crashes were fixed :smiley:

a minor issue with build 2186: when I quit sublime it opens a crash report window: gist.github.com/2009281

0 Likes

#20

So you’re saying that you broke ST2 on purpose just to test us? Genius.

0 Likes