Sublime Text 3 Beta

[bizoo]

@jps
1) Is it possible to make go to symbol within project pop up previews?
2) Is go to definition supposed to learn from previous user selections?
3) Would it be possible to hook into go to definition to filter out irrelevant suggestions?
4) How do I ignore certain folders in the sidebar from being indexed?

The GotoDefinition command is defined in a file symbol.py in the Default.sublime-package (which is a zip file) in your installation folder (C:\Program Files\Sublime Text 3\Packages for Windows).
So I suppose you can copy and paste the content of the file in a new file of your User folder, rename the class and adapt it to your need.

[AaronMT]

Here's a funny bug, when I open up a directory in Sublime Text 3 on Mac OS I see a whole slew of icons populate my dock that collapse into one. I have a bash alias

Code: Select all

alias subl="'/Applications/Sublime Text.app/Contents/SharedSupport/bin/subl'"


and I just open a directory such as

Code: Select all

subl ~/Library/Preferences/

to reproduce

[eugeneg]

Any roadmaps for future releases?..
I bought ST2 in May 2012 and from that time got only few updates, last was in September and no official info at all after that! Soon I will pay other $15 (or 30.. not sure how much..) and no updates again till 4th will be released?
All this looks a bit confusing and expensive.. even for good text editor.
I'm expecting to have free upgrades at least during next year after purchase and more info about future releases.... Please consider this.

[facelessuser]

Man, I was already behind a number of plugins do to varies reasons. Now I have to port them all...sigh...

Glad to see new builds though. I am excited to see and try out the new stuff coming.

[xeno.by]

The GotoDefinition command is defined in a file symbol.py in the Default.sublime-package (which is a zip file) in your installation folder (C:\Program Files\Sublime Text 3\Packages for Windows).
So I suppose you can copy and paste the content of the file in a new file of your User folder, rename the class and adapt it to your need.

Didn't have time to look into that yet, but would it be possible to show a preview of the currently selected option in the quick panel?

[bizoo]

The GotoDefinition command is defined in a file symbol.py in the Default.sublime-package (which is a zip file) in your installation folder (C:\Program Files\Sublime Text 3\Packages for Windows).
So I suppose you can copy and paste the content of the file in a new file of your User folder, rename the class and adapt it to your need.

Didn't have time to look into that yet, but would it be possible to show a preview of the currently selected option in the quick panel?

Sorry, don't understand.
I think it's already work the way you want:
F12 on a method open a quick_panel with all the occurrence of this name. And when navigating among the results you see a preview of the file in the editor.

[Anomareh]

All the details behind ST3 have been rather disappointing :/

First off, the switch to Python 3 is going to absolutely decimate the plugin community and any backwards compatibility is completely out of the question. Second, not a single bullet point in the list of new features for ST3 seems to warrant a major version increase. Symbol indexing is perhaps the best argument for it, but it's the only one. Pane management is already available for ST2 (origami). Speed is always a concern and has been improved several times throughout the life cycle of ST2. Lastly there's the API swapping from Python 2 to 3 which is more detrimental than beneficial.

There is not a single convincing reason to swap to ST3 in the announcement. If anything it is more convincing of the opposite with changes like swapping the API from Python 2 to 3. This all comes off as a rather disingenuous money grab. If you're going to arbitrarily end the life cycle of an existing product while at the same time increase the cost of it's replacement, at least present a product that is worthy of that cost. If ST2 licenses were available for $59 side by side ST3 licenses for $70 there'd be no reason what so ever to purchase an ST3 license. ST3 exists for the sole reason of increasing the cost of licenses.

Just compare the announcement of the ST2 public alpha to that of ST3.

Ugh.

[maiasaura]

Any idea how much the upgrade will cost (for ST2 users)?

[C0D312]

@Anomareh, wow, chill out. Upgrading to python 3 is the only way to move forward. The fact that it's not backwards compatible is old news. Get over it.

ST3 exists for the sole reason of increasing the cost of licenses.

umm, how about... no. I don't really get the point you're trying to make.

To clear up the money issues that some people (*cough* Anomareh) don't seem to understand:
(1.)Your ST2 license works for ST3 while it's in beta.
(2.)Considering that ST2 was in beta for about a year, I think you'll be okay. (Not to mention that ST2 was in alpha for a lonnnnng time)
(3.)An extra $15-30 really isn't asking much.

Also, ST3 is fast as fuck. You should get it.

[gregor.hoch]

Anomareh, this is a beta!! The under the hood changes are substantial and will lead to major benefits in the future. I am sure that more features will be added to ST3 before it is finalized. My guess is that the beta introduces the major under the hood changes, which are the foundation for future features that will make us very happy! I don't see any money grabbing - I rather think that the developer is extremely generous with an unlimited trial period. I haven't purchased a license myself but will do so this week! Best editor, awesome developer who deserves our support!