He kind of grows on you after a while .
ST3: FuzzyFileNav
Like a cancerous growth, or the mould in my bathroom. You just learn to live with it I guess
I’ve had something since ST1 that has similar functionality to what I understand this does.
However, this seems way more extensive so perhaps I won’t bother porting mine from ST2
Man, we SO need a better way to get the damn show_quick_panel input View huh?
It’s 2013 FFS
[quote=“castles_made_of_sand”]Man, we SO need a better way to get the damn show_quick_panel input View huh?
[/quote]
You like that overcomplicated quickpanel view capturing I put in there? So much work for so little sometimes…
Having said that, FFS, all that should NOT be necessary!
And having said THAT, I guess we should be grateful for the highlight call back eh?
And having said ALL that, now I’m tired!
I was waiting for you to port this before switching over to ST3 at work. Thank you!
(Oh, and support for saving . . . )
Yeah, savings been in there for a while. I even announced it. I figured you saw it, or would eventually stumble on it.
I think I saw this back when, but it doesn’t do what I mean by saving, if memory serves. I’ll have a look at it when I get home.
Alex
Yup. What I mean by ‘saving’ is replacing the functionality of Ctrl+S (Save) – i.e., saving the file if it already exists & otherwise popping open FFN*, preferably restricted so that I am forced to save the file before my ADD kicks in.
- I am, slowly, learning Colemak, which has caused me to become very fond of logograms & abbrv.
Alex
I will look into a little later. I think it is probably doable, but you would have to override your save shortcut with a FFN entry point. I can’t just add it to “on_save”, it just wouldn’t work well there. When I get a bit more time, I will look into this.
colemak ftw! I never learned qwerty so can’t compare it to anything but I never get sore hands
Never heard of colemak. Doesn’t look to hard to learn; not a huge change like dvorak. I may give it a try.
I would be very grateful! I’ve already mapped FFN to Ctrl+O, which is why its (short) absence from ST3 crippled me. I would have no problem doing the same for Ctrl+S, but you would need to provide an appropriate command. I looked into writing it myself, but it’s a little beyond my capabilities.
I can use the menu if I need to use my OS’s filesystem dialogs (or make appropriate commands for the palette).
FWIW, I started learning Colemak on Thanksgiving (you can imagine what fun I must have been having! ). I practiced for a couple dozen hours to get all the keys down and then it was a matter of training my muscle memory. I was doing around 20 WPM when I began confusing Colemak & Qwerty, thus necessitating switching 100%. (This was at the beginning of January. I should mention that I had a two-week hiatus from all keyboards just prior.) That was painful until I hit 30 WPM, which is about the minimum I can tolerate. I think I’m at about 40+ now (a far cry from the 90ish WPM I had originally), but I like Colemak thus far. I should also note that even though I was very fast, I did not know how to touch type.
Speaking of win, did you ever find a solution to using Colemak with Vim bindings in Sublime? I am a Vim virgin (or is that a vimgin?), but I don’t see how it would work with Colemak. Do you remap HJKL to HNEI? If, so, what do you do with N or I? Et cetera…
Alex
Edit: typos and silly things
Nah, I still don’t use Vintage/Vintageous ( though use my own home row and modal bindings )
Apparently the creator of colemak actually uses Sublime Text these days.
Last time I tried to get in contact with him to get some tips was definitely not a win.
In other words, that reminds me
We should hunt him down and pick his brains
Mind sharing? (Although I’m not sure what modal bindings are… they sound yummy.)
[quote]
Apparently the creator of colemak actually uses Sublime Text these days.
Last time I tried to get in contact with him to get some tips was definitely not a win.
In other words, that reminds me
We should hunt him down and pick his brains [/quote]
Is this the thread you are referring to? --> forum.colemak.com/viewtopic.php?id=50&p=1
I’ve looked at it, but not too closely.
Alex
I have now removed the setting in ST3 “nix_style_path_complete” and replaced it with a new setting.
[pre=#2D2D2D] // (fuzzy/windows/nix)
// fuzzy - this will auto-complete with the selected index in the quick panel
// windows - this will complete like a windows terminal would complete paths
// nix - this will complete like a unix/linux terminal traditionally completes paths
“completion_style”: “fuzzy”,[/pre]
By default, “fuzzy” is used for a more natural quick panel feel. The current selected index in the quick panel will now be used. This is for ST3 only.